1,474
edits
User talk:YEokkwang: Difference between revisions
m
→The reading of そして紫の幻想曲は全てを受け入れる
Printspike (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Also, in game readings can be wrong (see: the various ways they spelled "RoughSketch" in REFLEC) --totally not by [[User:MENDES|MENDES]] ([[User talk:MENDES|talk]]) 08:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC) | : Also, in game readings can be wrong (see: the various ways they spelled "RoughSketch" in REFLEC) --totally not by [[User:MENDES|MENDES]] ([[User talk:MENDES|talk]]) 08:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
* I know that the song is related to Yukari Yakumo so reading 紫 as Yukari makes sense (as I stated before). The thing is that the reading in the game file is likely submitted by the composers themselves. The reason why I think like that is that other songs also have obscure readings that the game file (supposedly) know how to read. I don't even have to go anywhere for an example. 幻想曲 in this song's title is read as "fantasia" in the game file. I did see 幻想曲 read as fantasia before (maybe you too) but how else are you supposed to know that it doesn't read as "gensoukyoku". Also, a counterargument to the RoughSketch thing is that this is a very different situation. This song is a contest song which probably requires the composer to submit everything, as opposed to RoughSketch commissioned songs which I don't think he needs to submit the reading of his own name every time hence the inconsistency. --[[User:Printspike|Spike!]] ([[User talk:Printspike|talk]]) 18:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC) | * I know that the song is related to Yukari Yakumo so reading 紫 as Yukari makes sense (as I stated before). The thing is that the reading in the game file is likely submitted by the composers themselves. The reason why I think like that is that other songs also have obscure readings that the game file (supposedly) know how to read. I don't even have to go anywhere for an example. 幻想曲 in this song's title is read as "fantasia" in the game file. I did see 幻想曲 read as fantasia before (maybe you too) but how else are you supposed to know that it doesn't read as "gensoukyoku". Also, a counterargument to the RoughSketch thing is that this is a very different situation. This song is a contest song which probably requires the composer to submit everything, as opposed to RoughSketch commissioned songs which I don't think he needs to submit the reading of his own name every time hence the inconsistency. --[[User:Printspike|Spike!]] ([[User talk:Printspike|talk]]) 18:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
: But I say: "Gensōkyoku"(Romaji) and "fantasia"(English) has same means here, that is to say, whether I write "Gensōkyoku" or "fantasia" can mean the same meaning. But in japanese, kanji "紫" doesn't means same things when it was read as "Shi" or "Yukari", even "murasaki", you'll distort the original meaning if you got wrong pronunciation.<br> | |||
For example, in japanese, you can't read "Murasakiiro"(むらさきいろ,"紫色" in kanji) as "Yukariiro"(ゆかりいろ), and you can't read "shiki"(しき, "紫気" in kanji) as "murasakiiki"(むらさきいき).<br> | |||
Here, "紫" represents neither phonetic nor color, so it can only express the pronunciation of name and a name of japanese can never have '''ONLY ONE KANA'''.<br> | |||
Please don't look at the contents of semi-phonetic scripts with the idea of pure phonetic scripts. It's quite normal for "a word to have multiple pronunciations and each pronunciation corresponds to different meanings" in such languages as Japanese, Korean and Chinese. Depending on the circumstances, the specific pronunciation must not be exactly the same.--[[User:YEokkwang|YEokkwang]] ([[User talk:YEokkwang|talk]]) 23:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC) | |||