Talk:Sakura (character): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Okay, so there's both a character and a song named Sakura. Um, should they be differentiated, like [[Sakura (song)]] and [[Sakura (character)]]? | Okay, so there's both a character and a song named Sakura. Um, should they be differentiated, like [[Sakura (song)]] and [[Sakura (character)]]? | ||
-[[User:Gameboyguy13|JD]] 19:03, 25 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
* Well, since the whole character affair revolves around Iroha, should we just append a section to Iroha's page about Sakura? I'm all for the disambiguation page if that's what goes through though. --[[User:Sakurina|Sakurina]] 23:27, 25 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
** Since I really don't know anything at all about IIDX characters, uh... was Sakura first introduced when she possessed Iroha? If so, then I'd think it's logical to just append onto Iroha, unless she becomes very significant later on or something. Otherwise, it'd just be a matter of changing links, I think... A disambiguation page might be helpful, though. -[[User:Gameboyguy13|JD]] 02:55, 26 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
*** Well, she's significant because she's the main character in IIDX RED. Just saying... :P --[[User:Sakurina|Sakurina]] 14:49, 27 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
Sakura is clearly a different character with different background than Iroha. Sure, she was ''introduced'' when she was dead and posessing Iroha, but now that she's alive and has a body again, it would be silly to just make her a footnote. (Maybe Erika should be a footnote for Celica, or vice versa, because they're twin sisters ... ? Ha, no.) And as Sakurina pointed out, she's kind of the image character for RED. So, I vote "no" for making Sakura a footnote on Iroha's page. --[[User:Miz|Miz]] 02:05, 28 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
*That sounds logical. So should this page be moved to [[Sakura (character)]], then? -[[User:Gameboyguy13|JD]] 05:58, 28 Nov 2005 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:58, 28 November 2005
Okay, so there's both a character and a song named Sakura. Um, should they be differentiated, like Sakura (song) and Sakura (character)? -JD 19:03, 25 Nov 2005 (EST)
- Well, since the whole character affair revolves around Iroha, should we just append a section to Iroha's page about Sakura? I'm all for the disambiguation page if that's what goes through though. --Sakurina 23:27, 25 Nov 2005 (EST)
- Since I really don't know anything at all about IIDX characters, uh... was Sakura first introduced when she possessed Iroha? If so, then I'd think it's logical to just append onto Iroha, unless she becomes very significant later on or something. Otherwise, it'd just be a matter of changing links, I think... A disambiguation page might be helpful, though. -JD 02:55, 26 Nov 2005 (EST)
- Well, she's significant because she's the main character in IIDX RED. Just saying... :P --Sakurina 14:49, 27 Nov 2005 (EST)
- Since I really don't know anything at all about IIDX characters, uh... was Sakura first introduced when she possessed Iroha? If so, then I'd think it's logical to just append onto Iroha, unless she becomes very significant later on or something. Otherwise, it'd just be a matter of changing links, I think... A disambiguation page might be helpful, though. -JD 02:55, 26 Nov 2005 (EST)
Sakura is clearly a different character with different background than Iroha. Sure, she was introduced when she was dead and posessing Iroha, but now that she's alive and has a body again, it would be silly to just make her a footnote. (Maybe Erika should be a footnote for Celica, or vice versa, because they're twin sisters ... ? Ha, no.) And as Sakurina pointed out, she's kind of the image character for RED. So, I vote "no" for making Sakura a footnote on Iroha's page. --Miz 02:05, 28 Nov 2005 (EST)
- That sounds logical. So should this page be moved to Sakura (character), then? -JD 05:58, 28 Nov 2005 (EST)