Talk:DIAVOLO: Difference between revisions
F5XS.0000a (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
F5XS.0000a (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In my opinion, Paganini's Caprice no. 24 sounds more like diavolo than Liszt's arrangement, what do you guys think? Caprice for reference - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpnIrE7_1YA (up to 4:24, even has that tough ending) --[[User:Xylo|Xylo]] ([[User talk:Xylo|talk]]) 18:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC) | In my opinion, Paganini's Caprice no. 24 sounds more like diavolo than Liszt's arrangement, what do you guys think? Caprice for reference - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpnIrE7_1YA (up to 4:24, even has that tough ending) --[[User:Xylo|Xylo]] ([[User talk:Xylo|talk]]) 18:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
DIAVOLO, to me, indeed borrows more from Paganini's ''Caprice No. 24'' than Liszt's ''Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6''. DIAVOLO borrows variations 3 (@ 0:30), 4 (@ 0:33), and 1 (@ 0:42) from Paganini's Caprice 24. | |||
DIAVOLO, to me, indeed borrows more from Paganini's Caprice No. 24 than Liszt's Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6. DIAVOLO borrows variations 3 (@ 0:30), 4 (@ 0:33), and 1 (@ 0:42) from Paganini's Caprice 24. | |||
There is also a unique variation @ 0:54 but I cannot tell for sure if it's Paganini's or Liszt's or it's a variation from another person who arranged Paganini's or an original variation. | There is also a unique variation @ 0:54 but I cannot tell for sure if it's Paganini's or Liszt's or it's a variation from another person who arranged Paganini's or an original variation. | ||
However, variation 11 (1:23) and the finale (1:35) are from Liszt's but it's not Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6 but rather an earlier (and much harder) arrangement entitled Etudes d'execution transcendante d'apres Paganini No. 6 | However, variation 11 (1:23) and the finale (1:35) are from Liszt's but it's not ''Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6'' but rather an earlier (and much harder) arrangement entitled ''Etudes d'execution transcendante d'apres Paganini No. 6''. They are almost a one-to-one copy from the said earlier Liszt's arrangement. | ||
--[[User:F5XS.0000a|F5XS.0000a]] ([[User talk:F5XS.0000a|talk]]) 13:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | --[[User:F5XS.0000a|F5XS.0000a]] ([[User talk:F5XS.0000a|talk]]) 13:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:09, 26 June 2020
Yeah, the overlays are said to be done by the "Charm Sisters" (チャーム・シスターズ), even though they look very VJ GYO-ish. Either way, I'll leave VJ GYO for his credit on his page for the overlays for DIAVOLO until I hear otherwise.--M.B. 09:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
In my opinion, Paganini's Caprice no. 24 sounds more like diavolo than Liszt's arrangement, what do you guys think? Caprice for reference - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpnIrE7_1YA (up to 4:24, even has that tough ending) --Xylo (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
DIAVOLO, to me, indeed borrows more from Paganini's Caprice No. 24 than Liszt's Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6. DIAVOLO borrows variations 3 (@ 0:30), 4 (@ 0:33), and 1 (@ 0:42) from Paganini's Caprice 24. There is also a unique variation @ 0:54 but I cannot tell for sure if it's Paganini's or Liszt's or it's a variation from another person who arranged Paganini's or an original variation. However, variation 11 (1:23) and the finale (1:35) are from Liszt's but it's not Grandes etudes de Paganini No. 6 but rather an earlier (and much harder) arrangement entitled Etudes d'execution transcendante d'apres Paganini No. 6. They are almost a one-to-one copy from the said earlier Liszt's arrangement. --F5XS.0000a (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)