Talk:Inside Jokes: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:49, 18 March 2017

Should "metting" be mentioned in here? When it was mentioned on the forums (as stupid as it seemed) I had no idea what everyone was talking about, and I wasn't the only one. DanAdamKOF 02:19, 1 Dec 2006 (EST)

No, leave it out. It's an Encyclopedia Dramatica thing. --TeamRagnarok 23:50, 4 Dec 2006 (EST)

Should we mention anything about it? Christinaaguilerafan56 11:50, 4 Jan 2014 (EST)

Thanks, Remi.

I think it would be best to split some of them off into a single "VJArmy memes" section --totally not by MENDES (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:49, 18 March 2017 (view source) MENDES (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:49, 18 March 2017 (view source) MENDES (talk \| contribs) (→‎A lot of these are old VJArmy in-jokes that aren't as relevant now) Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	== A lot of these are old VJArmy in-jokes that aren't as relevant now ==		== A lot of these are old VJArmy in-jokes that aren't as relevant now ==
	I think it would be best to split some of them off into a single "VJArmy memes" section		I think it would be best to split some of them off into a single "VJArmy memes" section --totally not by [[User:MENDES\|MENDES]] ([[User talk:MENDES\|talk]]) 21:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)