1,821
edits
User talk:YEokkwang: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Printspike (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Besides, I doubt that a toho doujin composer will make such mistakes.<br> | Besides, I doubt that a toho doujin composer will make such mistakes.<br> | ||
Please don't look at the contents of semi-alphabetic writing with the idea of pure alphabetic writing. It's quite normal for "a word to have multiple pronunciations and each pronunciation corresponds to different meanings" in such languages as Chinese, Japanese,and Korean. Depending on the circumstances, the specific pronunciation must not be exactly the same. --[[User:YEokkwang|Yeokkwang FOREVER]] ([[User talk:YEokkwang|talk]]) 04:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC) | Please don't look at the contents of semi-alphabetic writing with the idea of pure alphabetic writing. It's quite normal for "a word to have multiple pronunciations and each pronunciation corresponds to different meanings" in such languages as Chinese, Japanese,and Korean. Depending on the circumstances, the specific pronunciation must not be exactly the same. --[[User:YEokkwang|Yeokkwang FOREVER]] ([[User talk:YEokkwang|talk]]) 04:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
* (Sorry for a very late reply. Been very busy.) Your explanation is a bit confusing but according to what I tried to understand, you seem to get it wrong. You seem to get to the conclusion by reduction that is totally wrong. There is nothing preventing you from reading 紫 shi or murasaki or yukari. Just for an example: 紫 alone is read murasaki totally fine to mean "purple" as well as 紫色. In fact, murasaki alone is much more commonly used since murasakiiro is way too long of a word. So your argument is invalid now since the 紫 in the title can totally be read as murasaki fine, but that is not even the main reason why it is wrong. I'm not gonna explain further though since I don't have time. My main point of writing this is: '''We should base our content on a more credible source rather than some speculations (that is not even correct).''' --[[User:Printspike|Spike!]] ([[User talk:Printspike|talk]]) 13:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC) | |||