Talk:AC jb China: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Jack980517 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* The original Chinese jubeat should list all the songs that it has available, as technically all of them are new for the region. The other two installments should be compared to their respective predecessors. --[[User:FinalOffset|FinalOffset]] ([[User talk:FinalOffset|talk]]) 21:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC) | * The original Chinese jubeat should list all the songs that it has available, as technically all of them are new for the region. The other two installments should be compared to their respective predecessors. --[[User:FinalOffset|FinalOffset]] ([[User talk:FinalOffset|talk]]) 21:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
** If so, the "Full song list" page should be removed, as the [[jubeat]] page didn't have one. I would edit the "New Songs" section for the song list. --[[User:Jack980517|Jack980517]] ([[User talk:Jack980517|talk]]) 22:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:20, 14 July 2016
About the "New Songs" section: what version should the songs be compared to? If only songs exclusive to the Chinese release count as new (same as IIDX CN ver), then there would be no new songs for all 3 Chinese releases of jubeat. If we see this as just another variant of ripples, then the new songs list would be the same as ripples except for the 3 removed Chinese songs. And for the 2nd and 3rd releases, should they be compared to their former Chinese release? --Jack980517 (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- The original Chinese jubeat should list all the songs that it has available, as technically all of them are new for the region. The other two installments should be compared to their respective predecessors. --FinalOffset (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- If so, the "Full song list" page should be removed, as the jubeat page didn't have one. I would edit the "New Songs" section for the song list. --Jack980517 (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)