Talk:Y&Co. is dead or alive: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Does it really need a "new charts" section when all that changed (apparently) was that the Another was replaced with the Black Another?") |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does it really need a "new charts" section when all that changed (apparently) was that the Another was replaced with the Black Another? | Does it really need a "new charts" section when all that changed (apparently) was that the Another was replaced with the Black Another? --[[User:FSX|FSX]] ([[User talk:FSX|talk]]) 13:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
:That's how it's been done on all of the others that had this happen. I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on this. --[[User:Thunderbird|Thunderbird]] ([[User talk:Thunderbird|talk]]) 15:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
* It's just to keep pages tidy, given that there is a notecount change on at least one of the charts. --[[User:FinalOffset|FinalOffset]] ([[User talk:FinalOffset|talk]]) 18:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:18, 9 June 2018
Does it really need a "new charts" section when all that changed (apparently) was that the Another was replaced with the Black Another? --FSX (talk) 13:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- That's how it's been done on all of the others that had this happen. I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on this. --Thunderbird (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's just to keep pages tidy, given that there is a notecount change on at least one of the charts. --FinalOffset (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)